Ambedkar’s Scholarship and Pragmatism: A Radical Vision for Social Justice

In contemporary India, the discourse around social justice, reservation policies, and caste-based discrimination remains a heated subject. Recent debates over affirmative action policies, the implementation of reservation in the private sector, and constitutional amendments have reignited discussions about the legacy of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar. His scholarship, deeply rooted in a commitment to social transformation, is often analyzed through the lens of pragmatism, particularly in relation to the ideas of John Dewey. However, Ambedkar’s vision was far more radical than what pragmatism alone can encapsulate. His ideas on constitutional democracy, caste annihilation, and economic justice demand a broader interdisciplinary understanding that goes beyond Western philosophical frameworks.

UPSC GUIDE All India Scholarship Test 2025-26

Ambedkar and Pragmatism: Dewey’s Influence
Ambedkar’s Interpretation of Pragmatism
Limitations of Pragmatism in Understanding Ambedkar
Ambedkar on Caste as a Structural Problem
Religious and Social Transformation
Economic and Political Thought
Ethical Dimensions of Ambedkar’s Ideas
Way Forward: Relevance in Contemporary India

UPSC PRELIMS TEST SERIES - 2025

1. Ambedkar and Pragmatism: Dewey’s Influence

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, an erudite scholar and social reformer, was profoundly influenced by the American philosopher John Dewey, under whom he studied at Columbia University. Dewey’s ideas on pragmatism, democracy, and education significantly shaped Ambedkar’s approach to governance and social justice.

Dewey’s Pragmatism: This philosophy emphasizes problem-solving through empirical and rational means rather than relying on rigid ideological dogmas. Democracy, in Dewey’s view, was not just a governmental framework but an ethical way of life that ensured participatory decision-making.
Ambedkar’s Adaptation: Ambedkar integrated these ideas into his vision of a just society, particularly through his contributions to drafting the Indian Constitution. He saw democracy as a transformative force for dismantling social hierarchies and ensuring equal opportunities for all.
Key Example: The principle of constitutional morality, a concept Ambedkar championed, aligns with Dewey’s vision of democracy as a continuous social process rather than a static legal structure.

To read more about Constitutional Morality-Click Here

2. Ambedkar’s Interpretation of Pragmatism

While Ambedkar absorbed pragmatic methods, he did not merely rely on gradual reform. Instead, he believed in radical interventions where necessary:

Engagement with Gandhi: Unlike Mahatma Gandhi, who advocated for reform within the caste system through moral persuasion, Ambedkar outrightly rejected the caste structure as inherently oppressive. His debates with Gandhi on the Poona Pact (1932) highlight this fundamental difference.
Constituent Assembly Role: As the chief architect of the Indian Constitution, Ambedkar ensured the inclusion of progressive measures like abolition of untouchability (Article 17), affirmative action (Article 15 & 16), and protective rights for minorities.
Social Democracy vs Political Democracy: Ambedkar argued that democracy should not be limited to electoral politics but must pervade all aspects of social life. He criticized the Indian elite for promoting political democracy while neglecting economic and social democracy.
Key Example: His stance on reservations in education and jobs was not just about representation but about dismantling centuries of social exclusion.

3. Limitations of Pragmatism in Understanding Ambedkar

While pragmatism offers valuable insights, it does not fully capture Ambedkar’s radical approach, which involved systemic restructuring rather than gradual adjustment. Three key areas where pragmatism falls short include:

Caste as a Structural Issue – Unlike pragmatists who favor slow change, Ambedkar advocated for the complete annihilation of caste.
Radical Social and Religious Reforms – His conversion to Buddhism was not just a practical choice but a fundamental rejection of Hindu social structures.
Economic and Political Thought – Ambedkar’s state socialism and advocacy for workers’ rights extend beyond the typical pragmatic approach.

4. Ambedkar on Caste as a Structural Problem

Unlike incrementalists, Ambedkar recognized caste as a deeply entrenched social system requiring complete eradication:

Total Annihilation of Caste: In his landmark work Annihilation of Caste (1936), he dismantled the argument that caste could be reformed from within. Instead, he called for a complete rupture from Brahmanical traditions.
Challenges to Brahmanical Traditions: He argued that Hindu society was fundamentally structured around caste oppression and could not be reformed without discarding its foundational principles.
Modern-day Relevance: The Rohith Vemula case (2016) and continued caste atrocities highlight the persistence of structural discrimination.

Data Insight: According to NCRB data (2022), caste-based crimes have increased by 15% in the last decade, underscoring the need for Ambedkar’s radical solutions.

5. Religious and Social Transformation

Conversion to Buddhism (1956): A historic movement where Ambedkar and over 500,000 followers embraced Buddhism to escape caste oppression.
Beyond Pragmatism: This was not a mere practical move but a civilizational shift aimed at redefining Indian identity outside Hindu orthodoxy.
Key Example: The formation of Navayana Buddhism, a reinterpretation of Buddhism emphasizing social justice and equality.

6. Economic and Political Thought

State Socialism: Ambedkar proposed a system where key industries and resources were controlled by the state to prevent exploitation.
Trade Union Movements: His role in the Bombay textile mill strikes showcased his commitment to economic democracy.
Democratic Socialism: Unlike capitalism, he advocated for land reforms, wealth redistribution, and labor rights.

7. Ethical Dimensions of Ambedkar’s Ideas

Moral Foundations of Social Justice:

Liberty, Equality, Fraternity: Inspired by the French Revolution, but Ambedkar adapted these principles for India’s caste-ridden society.
Ethical Democracy: Advocated for constitutional morality as opposed to majoritarian rule.
Critique of Hindu Ethics: His Riddles in Hinduism exposed contradictions within Hindu religious texts.

Relevance to UPSC Ethics (GS-IV):

Case studies on caste-based policies
Ethics of affirmative action
Rights vs. social responsibilities in governance

8. Way Forward: Relevance in Contemporary India

Ambedkar’s vision remains highly relevant today:

Strengthening Social Justice Policies: Ensuring reservations and affirmative action policies are not diluted.
Economic Redistribution: Implementing policies on land reforms and equitable wealth distribution.
Caste Sensitization: Incorporating Ambedkar’s views into educational curricula beyond tokenistic mentions.
Interdisciplinary Research: Using sociology, law, economics, and philosophy to understand Ambedkar’s impact holistically.

Conclusion

Ambedkar’s ideas continue to shape India’s legal and social fabric. While influenced by pragmatism, his work was ultimately a call for structural transformation, not incremental reform. For UPSC aspirants, understanding his philosophy provides a multidimensional perspective on contemporary social justice issues and governance.

For Daily Current Affairs Click Here